THE INFLUENCE OF COMPENSATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE AT THE SAHID ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE
Main Article Content
Tuti Artianingsih
This study aims to determine the effect of compensation and organizational culture on employee performance at the Sahid Islamic Institute. partially and simultaneously the method used is descriptive quantitative. The population and sample in this study amounted to 44 people. Employees of the Sahid Islamic Institute of Religion. The technique of collecting data is by using a questionnaire, the technical analysis of the data used in this linear is multiple linear analysis. Analysis The research instrument uses SPSS ver 16.0. The results of the analysis consist of several tests, namely the validity test with Pearso Product Moment, all of which are declared valid. With a reliability test using Cronbach's alpha value > 0.6 and all the results are declared reliable. The normality test used the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test and all were declared to be normally distributed. The results of the statistical test of multiple linear regression analysis obtained the following regressions: 1) Compensation (Variable X1) has no positive and significant effect on employee performance at the Sahid Islamic Institute. This is explained based on the t-test (T-test). Compensation hypothesis testing (X1) on the Employee Performance variable (Y) shows a significance value of 0.977 which is greater (>) than 0.05. 2) Organizational Culture (Variable X2) has a positive and significant impact on employee performance at the Sahid Islamic Institute. This is based on the Organizational Culture hypothesis testing (X2) on the Employee Performance variable (Y) showing a significance value of 0.000 which is smaller (<) than 0.05. 3) Compensation (X1) and Organizational Culture (X2) Simultaneously influence the performance of employees at the Sahid Islamic Institute. This is based on the F test (f-test) F count of 26,031 with a significance result of 0.000 and F table = F (k; n-k) = F = (2;44-2) = 2.42 The results show that F count is 26,031 greater (>) than 2.42 and the value of sig. of 0.00 is smaller (<) than 0.05. Based on the determination test, employee performance is influenced by compensation and organizational culture by 56%.
Agus Eko Sujianto, “Aplikasi Statistik SPSS 16.0” Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka, hlm 96
Afandi, P. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Teori, Konsep, Dan Indikator). Pekanbaru: Zanafa Publishing.
Arifin, Alvin, Hamid, Djamhur dan Hakam, M. S. (2014). Pengaruh Pemberday
a – an Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (Studi pada Karyawan CV. Catur Perkasa Manunggal) (p. Vol. 8 No. 2.). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB).
Colquitt Jason A. (2009). Organizational Behavior: Improving Performance and Commitment in the workplace. New York: McGraw-Hill
Denison, D, & Mishra, A. (1995). “Toward Of Organizational Culture An Effectiveness”.Organization Science.
Eka Putra, J. Fitrios, Ruhul dan Afriana Hanif, R. (2020). Pengaruh Pengguna
an Teknologi Informasi Dan Kompetensi Pengguna Terhadap Kualitas Sistem Informasi Akuntansi, Serta Dampaknya Pada Kualitas Informasi Akuntansi (Studi Kasus Pada Pergurusan Tinggi Terakreditasi Di Provinsi Riau) (pp. 1– 13). Jurnal Riset Akuntasi Vol. 12 No. 1, April 2020.
Febriansyah, Angky dan Abdul Wahab, D. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh
Kemampuan Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada PT. Lakumas Rancaekek Bandung. Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Manajemen, Vol. 01. ISSN 2337- 5299.
Habibi. “Budaya Organisasi, Kompensasi, dan Kompetensi Pedagogik Serta Pengaruhnya terhadap Kinerja Guru”.2013. Retrieved October 25, 2015
Hasibuan, M. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Revisi.
Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Ketenagakerjaan. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 13.
Lestari, Dirga dan Maria, S. (2018). Anteseden Pemberdayaan
Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PDAM Di Samarinda Dan Kutai Kartanegara (p. Volume 2, Nomor 1, Desember 2018). INOBIS: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis dan Manajemen Indonesia.
Mulyadi. “Pengaruh Pemberian Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada PT. Balai Pustaka”. (2012). Retrieved October 25, 2015
Rivai, Vethzal & Basri. (2005). Peformance Appraisal: Sistem Yang tepat untuk Kinerja Karyawan dan Meningkatkan Daya Saing Perusahan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
Robbins, Stephen P. (2006). Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: PT Indeks, Kelompok
Gramedia
Sedarmayanti. (2017). Perencanaan dan Pengembangan SDM untuk
Meningkatkan Kompetensi, Kinerja dan Produktivitas Kerja. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Simamora, H. (2004). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi ke-3. Yogyakarta STIE YKPN
Siregar. S. (2013). Metode penelitian kualitatif dilengkapi dengan perbandingan perhitungan manual & SPSS. Jakarta: KENCANA
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif an R&D (Bandung: Alfabeta. 20060
Sunyoto, D. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, cetakan 1. Yogyakarta: CAPS
Yusuf, Ria Mardiana Dan Syarif, D. (2018). Komitmen Organisasi. Makasar:
CV. Nas Media Pustaka.
