Evaluasi Model Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Pada Program Unggulan Riset MAN 3 Palembang

nurviana nurviana

doi:10.56406/jkim.v9i01.205

Evaluation of the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Model in the MAN 3 Palembang Research Leading Program

nurviana nurviana

The aim of the study was to analyze the extent to which effectiveness is usability, as well as to analyze the inhibiting and supporting factors in the implementation of the MAN 3 Palembang Research Excellence Program using the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) approach model from Daniel L. Stufflebeam. This type of research is field research using data analysis and a qualitative approach. Data collection techniques used include: observation, interviews and documentation. The data analysis technique used is to carry out qualitative data analysis continuously until it is complete and the data is saturated. The stages carried out by the researcher were data reduction, data presentation and conclusion and verification. The results of this study indicate that in Context Evaluation, what is done after the program is running is that the program has reached the evaluation stage by carrying out program improvements by the MAN 3 Palembang management team. Input evaluation, supervision and assessment of KIR supervisor teachers and students has been carried out as well as during the selection of supervisor teachers and students. Materials, training, methods, media, research program facilities and infrastructure, operational funding sources and incentives have been managed as well as possible. Process Evaluation, MAN 3 Palembang has carried out a superior research program in the form of implementing both intra-curricular and extra-curricular Youth Scientific Groups (KIR). What makes it possible to revise the decision is that students who are advised that research class students whose proposals do not pass the selection for the competition to remain in the research class for the following year, are not immediately transferred to the regular class. Product, and achievement in winning research competitions, namely KIR's competition achievements are already good, while the research culture needs to be improved again. The inhibiting factor is that it is still possible to experience internet network interference, not all students use laptops, a lack of understanding of some students, lack of communication, students who still do not understand the material. Supporting factors are support in the form of motivation from various related parties, complete facilities and infrastructure, competent educators, enthusiastic students, support from student guardians and committees, comfortable school environment

Keywords: evaluasi program unggulan madrasah, CIPP, program riset, Kelompok Ilmiah Remaja (KIR). evaluation of madrasa flagship programs, CIPP, research programs, Youth Scientific Group (KIR)

Herlina, Rita Retnowati, dan Griet Helena Laihad. 2020. “Manajemen Sekolah Dalam Mewujudkan Sekolah Sehat Di Smp Islam Cendekia Cianjur (Sicc) Boarding School.” Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan 8(1):13–19. doi: 10.33751/jmp.v8i1.1949.

Hutabarat, Jemsly. 2006. Proses, Formasi dan Implementasi Manajemen Strategik Kontemporer Oprasionalisasi Strategi. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Johnson, R. Burke, dan Walter Dick. 2012. “Models of Program Evaluation.” Evaluating and Managing Instructional Programs and Projects (1990):96–101.

Jumari. 2020. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Madrasah Ramah Anak. Tinjauan Teoritis dan Praktis Berbasis CIPP Model. Cetakan pe. diedit oleh Abdul. Indramayu: CV. Adanu Abimata.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2020. “Permendikbud nomor 75 tahun 2020 tentang komite sekolah.”

Kustandi, Cecep, dan Daddy Darmawan. 2020. Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran. Konsep dan Aplikasi Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Bagi Pendidik di Sekolah dan Masyarakat. Edisi Pert. Jakarta: Kencana (Devisi Prenadamedia Group).

Olatunji, Michael. 2017. “Critical Thinking in Nigeria’s Pre-Service Teachers Education: A Philosophical Investigation.” Critical Thinking in Nigeria’s Pre-Service Teachers Education: A Philosophical Investigation 6(2):205–21.

Pera, A. 2019. “GAMBARAN UMUM MADRASAH ALIYAH NEGERI 3 PALEMBANG.” 1–23.

Prakoso, Bagus Hary, Zulmi Ramdani, dan Bilqisthi Rahmah. 2021. “Teacher’s Perception on Merdeka Belajar Policy.” Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment 3(2). doi: 10.26499/ijea.v3i2.84.

Puspita, Ingelia, Rudy Iskandar, dan I. Putu Danny Hadi Kusuma. 2021. Kerangka Bagan Akun Standar pada Sistem Perbendaharaan dan Anggaran Negara. diedit oleh R. A. Pasha. Jakarta: Dirjen Perbendaharaan Kemenkeu.

Putra, Andreas, T. A. 2018. “Evaluasi program pendidikan: Pendekatan evaluasi program berorientasi tujuan (Goal-oriented evaluation approach).” Jurnal IAIN 55–68.

Rini Aulia, yaswinda, Mega Adyna Movitaria. 2022. “Penerapan Model Evaluasi CIPP dalam Mengevaluasi Penyelenggaraan Lembaga PAUD tentang Pendidikan Holistik Integratif di Nagari Taram.” Jurnal Inovasi Penelitianitian 2(8):2363–72. doi: 2722-9475.

Setiyaningrum, Ayu. 2016. “Implementasi Model Evaluasi CIPP Pada Pelaksanaan Program Implementation of Cipp Evaluation Model on the Education and Training.” e-Jurnal Prodi Teknologi Pendidikan V:265–79.

Sofica, Verra, Tasha Samira Febiola, Minda Septiani, dan Rahayu Ningsih. 2020. “Penerimaan Peserta Didik Baru Secara Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 pada SMPIT Tambun Islamic School.” Jurnal Infortech 2(2):177–83. doi: 10.31294/infortech.v2i2.9122.

Soleh, Ibnu. 2023. Manajemen Pendidikan Islam. Cetakan Pe. diedit oleh N. Duniawati. Indramayu: CV. Adanu Abimata.

Stufflebeam, Daniel L., dan Zhang Guili. 2017. The CIPP Evaluation Model How to Evaluate for Improvement and Accountability. e-book. New York: The Guilford Press.

Sugiman, Iman, Muchtar Luthfie, dan Rizal Taufikkurohman. 2020. “Analisis Kebutuhan Inovasi Teknologi terhadap Peningkatan Kinerja Pegawai Kementerian Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen 9(2):122. doi: 10.32502/jimn.v9i2.2507.

Susita, Dewi. 2023. Teori Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetakan I. diedit oleh Hanita. Bantul Yogyakarta: Penerbit Samudra Biru.

Terry, George R., dan Leslie W. Rue. 2019. Dasar-dasar Manajemen Edisi Revisi (Buku terjemahan dari judul asli Principples of Management). Cetakan pe. diedit oleh B. S. Fatmawati. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Turmuzi, Muhammad dkk. 2021. “Evaluasi Keterlaksanaan Kurikulum 2013 Menggunakan Model Evaluasi CIPP (Context, Input, Process, dan Product).” Jurnal basicedu 5(6):6349_6356.

Widodo, Hendro. 2019. Pendidikan Holistik Berbasis Budaya Sekolah. cetakan pertama diedit oleh H. Rahmawan. Yogyakarta: Uad Press.

Wildani. 2021. Perencanaan Satuan Pendidikan Madrasah. Cetakan Pe. diedit oleh M. Hidayat. Lombok Tengah, NTB: Pusat Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Penelitian Indonesia.

Yeni, Dea Ismi, Heny Wulandari, dan Eti Hadiati. 2020. “Pelaksanaan Program Pemberian Makanan Sehat Anak Usia Dini : Studi Evaluasi Program CIPP.” Murhum : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini 1–15. doi: 10.37985/murhum.v1i2.9.